Key Takeaways:
✔️ Our firm’s diligence was critical in proving the defendant’s negligence.
✔️ We turned a “no offer” stance into a near-policy-limit settlement.
✔️ The case was resolved confidentially, before deposition, sparing our client further litigation stress.
✔️ Our firm’s diligence was critical in proving the defendant’s negligence.
✔️ We turned a “no offer” stance into a near-policy-limit settlement.
✔️ The case was resolved confidentially, before deposition, sparing our client further litigation stress.
Our client, a 52-year-old woman, was driving her two-door coupe in Apple Valley, heading home. As she prepared to make a left turn onto a two-lane highway on a green light, her life changed in an instant. Another driver ran a red light, slamming into the passenger side of her vehicle. The collision caused major damage to her car.
The police traffic collision report placed fault squarely on the driver who ran the red light. However, despite the clear facts, the defendant refused to accept responsibility for causing the crash.
As a result of the collision, our client suffered multiple injuries, including:
- Concussion
- Headaches
- Dizziness
- Memory problems
- Neck, left shoulder, back, hip, and left hand pain
- Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Her injuries forced her to miss time from work following the accident and severely disrupted her daily life and routines.
Legal Challenges and Strategy
Despite the police report and property damage evidence, the defendant denied liability. Initially, the insurance company adopted a “no offer” position.
Our firm, led by Attorney Robert Miller, approached the case with persistence and a strategic focus on proving fault. We urged the insurance company’s attorney to closely examine the traffic collision report and the physical damage to both vehicles. Through clear presentation of the evidence and persuasive communication, we convinced the insurer to reassess their position.
Our team also worked to counter the defense’s efforts to downplay the seriousness of our client’s injuries.
The Outcome
After months of hard work—including in-depth discovery, extensive negotiations, and continuous pressure on defense counsel and the claims adjuster—we secured a confidential settlement.
This case stands as another example of M&Y’s unwavering commitment to securing justice for injury victims—even when the defendant refuses to accept responsibility.
